Leadership Style and Creativity Technique

Question: Discuss about the Leadership Style and Creativity Technique. Answer: Introduction Leadership is considered as one of the success stories that had made the world be the way it is today. Various scholars have deduced that leadership is a learned behavior, while others have dismissed such claims and considered leadership as a born behavioral trait. Where it not of good leadership, then we could not have successful business or organizations (Chaudhry and Javed, 2012). On the other hand, the failures of similar organizations are also attributed to poor leadership. I consider that leadership is a behavioral practice that has to be cultured in order to meet the needs and demands of the people. We cannot shy away from good leadership, but we can correct or amend our bad leadership styles to conform to better and well-known leadership traits that meets modern or contemporary needs and demands (Chemers, 2014). The purpose of this paper is to discuss leadership theories as well as factors that attributed to bad and good leadership (limitations of theories). What is leadership? There are various definition of leadership. The below are the main and well-known definitions of leadership: First, leadership can be defined as a quality of behaviour of a group of people or an individual whereby they guide the people or the activities of the people in organizing efforts. Secondly, it can also be defined as the ability of a superior person to introduce to its subordinates the roles and responsibility in confidence and power to handle their chores (Chemers, 2014). Thirdly, it is a process that executives of a given organization are able to direct as well as guide and influence the work of others in order to meet the needs and the demands or to attain certain goals (Herrmann and Felfe, 2014). It may also be defined as the position held by group of people or an individual that offers him or her a chance to participate interpersonal influence on others members in order to direct and mobilize their efforts towards attaining certain goals and objectives. The leader is supposed to manage the group, promote group cohesion and move others to attain the goals of the group and to maintain the pace or momentum of the group or team. The leader may arise in the team or group because of his or her personal values and qualities or by the virtue of common consent by other group members. In this case, the leader is able to drive his or her will and power from others team or group members. He is considered to go ahead with the leadership position at will or the team in a collective manner (Herrmann and Felfe, 2014). It is considered that leadership exists in most team or group setting regardless of the size of the group. Leadership can also be considered as an influential process. The leader is placed in a position to be able to regulate, change, shape and control the performance, attitude and behaviour of all the members they manage. This means that leadership is a process that can be managed by an individual who in this case is a leader (John and Taylor, 2014). A leader is supposed to ensure that the members under him or her are able to meet their needs and demands as well as offer the needed requirements. The work of the leader is to support the team to get the needed value as well as meeting their objectives in the workplace as well as other places or interest. It is clear that leadership has various definitions not limited to the values of the same. It is ideal to consider that the best definitions of leadership is valued to the leader himself or herself (Lam and O'Higgins, 2012). Trait theories The theories states that good leaders or effective leaders have a common interest on some of the personalities such as traits and characteristics. According to early trait theories, leadership is innate, it has instinctive qualities that you may or may not have. Thanks to the new values of leadership that denote leadership qualities can be learned. It is clear that trait theories help to identify the best leadership traits and qualities. However, it is clear that none of the traits or even a combination of the theories will be able to offer or support the success of leadership. The theories also state that traits are external behaviours that come up from our minds. It is clear that the theories are considered as an internal and external processes and beliefs that are vital of effective leadership (Lam and O'Higgins, 2012). Therefore, it is ideal to note that the facets of trait theories are there to support of clarify the traits that are related to the ethical systems of a group or an individual when it comes to support of better leadership. It is ideal to note that trait theories have offered better understanding of the values that have to be on board to create a better leader. Leadership is considered as a behavior or values that is developed or created in order to support leadership success (Preston, 2012). Limitation of Trait Theory The theories do not explain the subjective judgment in ascertaining a good and successful leader. It is ideal to note that there are a list of traits that are attributed to better or good leadership values. However, these descriptions are general in nature hence does not explain the values of better and bad leadership. The theories also support disagreement over the traits that are very important to effective and successful leadership Lastly, it is clear that the theories are very complex to comprehend hence not affirmative to leadership models. Behavioral theories It is clear that behavioral theories explain how leaders behave. For example, it also explains how leaders ought to do in order to get leadership in the right manner, for example getting the needed values that support leadership. It explains the best leadership styles that can ensure valuable leaders. The theories explain the ways in which values or rights in leadership is able to offer when it comes to leadership performance (Preston, 2012). The theories also explain that leaders may use various types of leadership behaviors at different times. It also explains that leaders are able to use various leadership styles to explain the same in various ways. Limitations of Behavioral Theories likewise, behavioral theories have limitations as trait theories. First it does not explain the causes of bad leadership especially in the contemporary world, knowing that most of the leaders are known to have better leadership. Lastly, it does not pin the values that are considered important when it comes to provision of best leadership traits (Roueche, Baker III and Rose, 2014). Thus, it is clear that behavioral theories, do not explain the facets of leadership, for instance, it does not explain the best leadership styles that should be adopted but rather it offer a list of many leadership styles. Recommendations The below two recommendations will be ideal in support for better leadership: In order to create of develop better leadership, it is important to facilitate training in our organizations to boost or improve our leadership skills and potentials On the other hand, it is recommended that effective leadership should be nurtured to offer best answers to future leaders. Successful leaders should be a motivation for current as well as future leaders. Conclusion I conclude that despite the fact that there are various theories related to better leadership, it is the responsibility of the leader to ensure that his team is well managed. Leaders should give their subordinates a chance to contribute toward good leadership. References Chaudhry, A.Q. and Javed, H., 2012. Impact of transactional and laissez faire leadership style on motivation. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(7). Chemers, M., 2014. An integrative theory of leadership. Psychology Press. Herrmann, D. and Felfe, J., 2014. Effects of leadership style, creativity technique and personal initiative on employee creativity. British Journal of Management, 25(2), pp.209-227. John, M.C. and Taylor, J.W., 2014, August. Leadership style, school climate, and the institutional commitment of teachers. In International Forum Journal (Vol. 1, No. 2). Lam, C.S. and O'Higgins, E.R., 2012. Enhancing employee outcomes: The interrelated influences of managers' emotional intelligence and leadership style. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 33(2), pp.149-174. Preston, T., 2012. The president and his inner circle: Leadership style and the advisory process in foreign policy making. Columbia University Press. Roueche, P.E., Baker III, G.A. and Rose, R.R., 2014. Shared vision: Transformational leadership in American community colleges. Rowman Littlefield. Van Wart, M., 2014. Dynamics of leadership in public service: Theory and practice. Routledge.