The Hawk Essay -- English Literature Essays

The war tilt EssayTed Hughes and Robbin Jeffers offer many similarities and differences in their poems about tilts. Although written using differentiate styles, the poems share numerous judgements and themes. These ideas embarrass advocate against weakness, arrogance, and jubilancy of peddles as Gods chosen ruler. Yet, Hughes and Jeffers show different attitudes towards hawks, one acting as a dictator of Creation, and the other as a defeated, yet still complianceable bird. The issue of mightiness versus weakness is transmitted strongly in both poems. In Hawk roosting, the hawks image is captured in an authoritative tone, especially by the enhancement of first person view. The hawks domination and power is highlighted in the poem by describing its supreme perspective above all in almost all aspects of its life. I sit in the top of the woodland, my eyes closed conveys a understanding of forceful peace, as if the hawk knows it holds so much power that it is fearless and bottom roost confidently without being attacked. To sit in the top of the wood in like manner demonstrates a noble rank, resembling the king in the human royal monarchy. The line I kill where I please because it is all mine emphasises the power the hawk believes he holds, as if he has ownership over Creation. Meanwhile, all other creations made by God are symbols of inferiority, acting to serve the hawk and die when he chooses for them to die. For example, Now I hold Creation in my foot suggests tat he holds the trees limbs, a foundation of life, under his grasp. The manner in which he dictates the fear of law under his reign as seen in My eyes has permitted no change. I am going to keep things like this also conveys the idea that the hawk alone can overcome any other force. Similarly, Hurt Hawks also creates the issue of power against weakness. Despite the fact that the hawks wing is injure and cannot fly, cat nor coyote forget shorten the week of waiting for death. This illustr ates how high the hawk is in the food chain and how domineering he is in nature. At distance no one only if death the redeemer will humble that head emphasises again that the hawk rules the land, and nothing but death will claim him. In the final lines but what soared the fierce rush the night V herons by the flooded river cried fear at its salary increase shows the everlasting power of the hawk. Despite the loss of its... ...k, results in a highly negative image. For example, there is no sophistry in my body. My manners are trigger-happy off heads V the allotment of death conveys a tone of malice and savageness. Thus the idea of hawk is critical. On the other hand, Jeffers admires the courage of the hawk in his poem. He describes the long-suffering in the bird, and the agony if experiences since it is physically stronger than other creatures but is now powerless. There is a sense of pity and sympathy as Jeffers describes the immanent strength the hawk tries to maintain. Admir ation is depicted in Beautiful and wild, the hawk, and men that are dying, remember him, where he suggests that even men pay respect to the impertinence the hawk possesses. These contrasting concepts of criticism ad admiration are responsible for the difference of ideas expressed in the two poems. Through analysing the poems in terms of these subjects, attitudes and themes, similarities and differences can be made. Whilst the idea of power against weakness, arrogance and exultation of hawks role in creation is supported by both Hughes and Jeffers poems, the impressions of criticism and respect towards the eagles are contrasting. The Hawk Essay -- English Literature EssaysThe Hawk EssayTed Hughes and Robbin Jeffers offer many similarities and differences in their poems about hawks. Although written using contrasting styles, the poems share numerous ideas and themes. These ideas include power against weakness, arrogance, and exultation of hawks as Gods chosen ruler. Y et, Hughes and Jeffers show different attitudes towards hawks, one acting as a dictator of Creation, and the other as a defeated, but still respectable bird. The issue of power versus weakness is transmitted strongly in both poems. In Hawk roosting, the hawks image is captured in an authoritative tone, especially by the enhancement of first person view. The hawks domination and power is highlighted in the poem by describing its supreme position above all in almost all aspects of its life. I sit in the top of the wood, my eyes closed conveys a sense of forceful peace, as if the hawk knows it holds so much power that it is fearless and can roost confidently without being attacked. To sit in the top of the wood also demonstrates a noble rank, resembling the king in the human royal monarchy. The line I kill where I please because it is all mine emphasises the power the hawk believes he holds, as if he has ownership over Creation. Meanwhile, all other creations made by God are symbols of inferiority, acting to serve the hawk and die when he chooses for them to die. For example, Now I hold Creation in my foot suggests tat he holds the trees limbs, a foundation of life, under his grasp. The manner in which he dictates the maintenance of law under his reign as seen in My eyes has permitted no change. I am going to keep things like this also conveys the idea that the hawk alone can overcome any other force. Similarly, Hurt Hawks also creates the issue of power against weakness. Despite the fact that the hawks wing is injured and cannot fly, cat nor coyote will shorten the week of waiting for death. This illustrates how high the hawk is in the food chain and how domineering he is in nature. At distance no one but death the redeemer will humble that head emphasises again that the hawk rules the land, and nothing but death will claim him. In the final lines but what soared the fierce rush the night V herons by the flooded river cried fear at its rising shows the everlasti ng power of the hawk. Despite the loss of its... ...k, results in a highly negative image. For example, there is no sophistry in my body. My manners are tearing off heads V the allotment of death conveys a tone of malice and savageness. Thus the idea of hawk is critical. On the other hand, Jeffers admires the courage of the hawk in his poem. He describes the submission in the bird, and the agony if experiences since it is physically stronger than other creatures but is now powerless. There is a sense of pity and sympathy as Jeffers describes the internal strength the hawk tries to maintain. Admiration is depicted in Beautiful and wild, the hawk, and men that are dying, remember him, where he suggests that even men pay respect to the boldness the hawk possesses. These contrasting concepts of criticism ad admiration are responsible for the difference of ideas expressed in the two poems. Through analysing the poems in terms of these subjects, attitudes and themes, similarities and dif ferences can be made. Whilst the idea of power against weakness, arrogance and exultation of hawks role in creation is supported by both Hughes and Jeffers poems, the impressions of criticism and respect towards the eagles are contrasting.