The Wifes Lament Essay -- Poet Wifes Lament Speaker

The married chars LamentOver the years, there adopt been many interpretations of who the verbaliser of The wifes Lament could be. These range from re anyy interesting ideas to ones that seem a little rough around the edges. It is obvious that no sure conclude rear be found due to the fact that whoever wrote this poem is stillborn and that the answer will always be in speculation eventide if it is correct. Hopefully, at the end of this quest I will be around more enlightened as to who the true speaker may truly be. thither are some things that we do know about this poem. It is most(prenominal) often referred to as an elegy because of the mood of mourning and regret. Upon further development I discovered that this poem is like others of its time period. Many parallels can be seen between The married womans Lament and The Wanderer. The Wanderer is a poem about a man that is exiled due to war and inside information his miserable life in the wintry wilderness. Another poem that resembles The married womans Lament is Wulf and Eadwacer. In both of these poems, the speaker is interpreted to be a woman unlike other poems of the time. Wulf and Eadwacer is about a woman who has been involved with two men, the dreaded love-triangle. When the woman was separated from her lover, Wulf, she is taken into the substantial arms of another man, Eadwacer. This causes her much happiness only also anguish over the lost love of Wulf. Thus the lament of this woman is very similar to the speaker in The Wifes Lament.The various interpretations of The Wifes Lament may argue on who the speaker is, but there is one thing that can not be denied. There is no doubt that this poem is about lamenting exile and the trials the speaker must face due to this exile. No matter who the speaker is, he/she is wroug... ... I think that anyone that reads this poem should be told about this interpretation so that they can at least consider it. The question of who is speaking in The Wifes Lament will never be answered because there are too many facts that arent provided. It would have been wonderful if the poet would have stated straight away that the speaker was a woman or a goddess or any of the other possible people or things. The only thing that readers of this poem can do is take all of these interpretations into consideration and use them to form their own idea of who the speaker is. I am very glad that I was introduced to this work and that I had the fortuity to examine the various arguments of who is speaking. I think that when reading any erect of literature it should be looked at in a similar make as trying to pick apart who is speaking in The Wifes Lament.