The Unresolved Bridge Problem Essay -- Philosopher Karl Popper

Philosopher Karl Popper, an inductive skeptic, is criticized by his objection to confirmation. Rather than exploitation the term confirmation to describe a theory that has continued to be proven correctly, Popper created his own term. Popper says that corroboration is a term employmentd to describe theories that have been tested and not til now falsified. According to Peter Godfrey-Smith (G-S), Popper can say why we should prefer to use a theory that has not been falsified all over a theory that has been falsified (Smith 68). The conundrum with Popper lies when he is presented with 2 theories, neither of which has been falsified. This is when Popper has difficulty choosing one theory over another. This situation can be better understood by tone at the bridge problem. I will argue that Popper is unable to operate the bridge problem using corroboration because the term is synonymous with confirmation. thither ar two theories (T1 speculation One) and (T2 Theor y Two) that have different implications for how to skeleton a bridge. These two theories are similar because they both have not been falsified however they differ because one has been tested and the other has not. The theories are express explicitly below.T1 Theory that has been tested many times and has never been falsifiedT2 Theory that has never been tested and has never been falsifiedNext we can formally reinstate the argument in modus ponens form as follows (P1)If T1 is corroborated, then T1 is noetic(P2)T1 is corroborated(C)T1 is rationalBefore I say what is wrong with the argument, I want to rationalize the bridge objection. In Theory and Reality, G-S presents the bridge problem, which is a response to Popper make by inductivists. I chose to explain this... ...t his term corroboration is synonymous to confirmation.In conclusion, I have argued that Popper is unable to solve the volleyball problem using corroboration because the term is synonymous with corroboration and P opper denies confirmation. Granted, there must be more to what Popper thinks of corroboration, we have no reason from the readings to see why the two terms corroboration and confirmation differ. Until Popper says more about corroboration we are entitled to treat the term as equivalent in importee to confirmationWork CitedBlackmon, James. chit-chat 13 Confirmation. Philosophy 30. UC DAVIS. Davis, 5 Nov2013. Blackmon, James. Lecture 17 Poppers Bridge. Philosophy 30. UC DAVIS. Davis, 26 Nov2013. Godfrey-Smith, Peter. Theory and Reality An submission to thePhilosophy of Science. Chicago University of Chicago, 2003. Print.