Economic Impact of Population and Technology on the Environment :: Environment Environmental Pollution Preservation

Economic Impact of cosmos and Technology on the Environmentpostulate any economic expert what twain things have qualifyingd in the past three or so gazillion years since adult male first began appearing in demographically signifi arouset meter and he will tell you with unwavering confidence population and technology. And that economist would be right. These two factors are the root cause of every change in the standard of living we have experienced since the dawn of humanity. any(prenominal) anthro-ecologist posed with the same question and will offer up secondary more than a puzzled look. Only two? The point, here, is that economists have a certain tendency to apply Razors Axiom to every situation imaginable. looking at the effect humans have on the environment is nearly comm solo a qualitative exercise. While it may be possible to count sheer number of deer hunted or shape miles of forest burned as the result of human involvement in nature, much(prenominal) calculat ions are more commonly d iodin with anecdotes and broad forecasts. Ask an economist to measure the damage done to the environment by humans and you will hear about equivalent and compentating differentials two quantitative methods of valuing a qualitative loss. Both neccesitate understanding humans preferences and values, and take an understandably anthropocentric captivate of the Earth. Regardless, in absolute, per capita, and relative terms, both of those differentials have increased consistently everyplace the course of human history. The first step in evaluating human electric shock on the environment is to elucidate what we consider human-caused ecological damage. There are, non surprisingly, a great many approaches possibly in defining such a broad concept, but there are a a couple of(prenominal) basic principles which are nearly universal lamentables. The amends in this elucidation are defined with a Darwinian perspective. One such bad is the loss of diversit y among non-human population. This loss of diversity can take the diversity of extinction of plants or animals, a loss of genetic diversity among one species, or a forced-relocation of an existing population. Another bad is the transformation of terra, whether intentional or unintentional, as the result of human activity. Examples are common look at 1930 s Oklahoma Dust Bowl and are often caused by agricultural activities. The next step in evaluating the extent human-caused environmental damages lies in the measurement of such damages. Since no dollar value can be placed on the extinction of a species, we must estimate the value that species contributes to the Earth s consumption (evaluating changes in consumption is the only way we can say that one situation is better than another).