A Comparison of the Villains of A Dolls House and Madame Bovary :: comparison compare contrast essays

Similarities in the Villains of A Dolls House and Madame Bovary   Bibliography w/2 sources Krogstad and Lheureux be two literary villains created by Henrik Ibsen and Gustave Flaubert respectively. Between them, they share many similarities. They both are exploiting the main(prenominal) character of the novels they are in. They both want something, which was at least at one point money. They both seem cold and heartless, remorseless, though twee at one point in time. When are also also in that when they want something, they will resort to vicious means of getting it. They know the secrets in which both novels p portions are based. The list of similarities is signifi gouget as any one arouse see, but can they really be named "similar"? Perhaps they have some in common, but are the characters truly alike? It would seem to me that they are actually very different. It can be argues either way, but the correct answer to this question can only come though examinati on. Weighing both the likenesses and similarities will endure out either extreme in likeness, but perhaps they come across into a category close to one side. In this essay I intend to cut through the protective fibers set by Flaubert and Ibsen, and to see to it the contents of two important characters, to compare them, and to contrast. Both Lheureux and Krogstad want something. At first they both want money, which is a large similarity. Soon Krogstad changes his indigence to keeping his job, and Lheureux just lets the debts owed to him by Emma Bovary build up. They both seem comme il faut at one point in each work. Lheureux begins on a good note, being very kind to Emma and her husband. He extends a lot of credit to Emma, which she abuses, and unwittingly plans her own demise. Krogstad on the other hand begins with a money grubbing attitude, though not quite as ruthless as that of Lheureux. Krogstads ultimately progresses through the play, when at the end he is actually a decen t individual. It would seem that as far as character advancement goes, the two are inverse of each other. They both use threats to draw what they want. In Lheureuxs case, he threatens to tell her husband, and later foreclosure if she doesnt pay. She managed to put Lheureux off for a while. Finally he lost patience...Hed be forced to take defend the things he had brought her.