Civil War North vs South

The North and second were deeply catchment basind in the eject of dingy courteous rights, with the North adopting a pro-civil rights stead and the South adopting a pro- slaves stance. The assorted excretory product histories and scotchs mean(a)s of the North and South voices regulate these different views on civil rights for total darkness slaves during 1 820 off 860. The Norths pro-civil rights stance grew as a result Of solid economical unspiritual in industrialization and their solution history of sacred liberty.While the Norths soil and humor did not favor large plantations, this region did have many natural resources which helped fuel the proceeds of industrialization and urban areas. As shown in register A in the Railroads in 1860, the North had more than two-thirds of the rail line tracks which made it easier to rainspout goods and drive the economy. Be arrive this industrial growth was not bloodsucking on slave tire, but immigrants coming to the cit ies, Northerners saw the blacks as people not just economic resources.In addition, the North had been established on religious emancipation and had been the focus on Americas scrap for independence, so the North was tolerant of messages from abolitionists like Frederick Douglas who talked about the injustice of slaves lack of freedom (Document C). These views were also shown in response to the bathroom brownish incident who tried to borrow a federal arsenal and leap a slave uprising (Document E). The Northerners called Brown a martyr for the sacred cause of freedom. Thus, the northerners didnt rely on slave labor for their industrial economy and were tolerant of messages of freedom due to their settlement history, which led to their pro- civil rights stance. On the other hand, the Souths economic base was largely market-gardening, and their dependence on slave labor drove their pro-slavery stance. The Southern colonies were primarily settled for cash crops, like like and to bacco, because of their fertile soil and climate.As shown in Document A, The Slave Density and Cotton Production, 1860, cotton fiber was almost exclusively grown in the South, and to a great extent relied on slave labor. In addition, the South had limited industry and relied heavily on the North for almost every article of utility and adornment And that were are dependent on Northern capitalists for the means indispensable to build our railroads, canals, and there public exile (Document B). Because agriculture was their key economic base and was dependent on slave labor, the Southerners viewed slaves as economic resources or property quite a than people.They gestated the Supreme Courts decision in the arid Scott case, which held the the Fifth Amendment did not apply to African Americans because they were property, as proof of their viewpoint. They believed that civil rights would get down their economy, and became violent against antislavery actions such as in the John Brown case that they believed were plot by the North (Document E). Therefore, because the civil rights performance would have destroyed the southern economy which was heavily dependent on agriculture and slave labor, they adopted adopted pro-slavery stance.Therefore the different colonization histories and economics of the North and South led to the Norths pro-civil rights stance and the Souths pro-slavery stance in 1820 to 1860. These differences truly divided a country as described by Abraham capital of Nebraska during his Republic nomination speech for U. S. Senator A house divided against itself cannot stand. I believe this government cannot endure permanently one-half slave and half free. His speech foreshadowed the divide that would ultimately lead to the Civil War, in which North fought against South over the issue of slavery.